When Akam Hamak considers acquiring an internet business, he is not only reading a spreadsheet. He is reading a system, its code, its dependencies, its quiet fragilities, the places where a number that looks healthy is hiding a problem. Evaluating a company, for him, is a technical exercise as much as a financial one.
That dual literacy is the edge. Most buyers of small internet businesses can read a profit-and-loss statement; fewer can look under the hood and judge whether the thing is built to last. Hamak, a self-taught engineer who did penetration testing and earned bug bounties, brings a trained instinct for where systems break. He evaluates the machine, not just the receipts.
He starts with durability rather than upside. The most dangerous question, in his telling, is whether a business’s current performance can survive contact with the future, a platform change, a lost traffic source, a dependency that could vanish. Hamak looks for revenue that rests on something stable, and he is wary of numbers propped up by a single fragile channel.
His security background sharpens the search for weak points. Bug bounty work trains you to assume something is wrong and to go find it, and Hamak applies that adversarial mindset to diligence. Rather than confirming a business is good, he tries to prove it is broken, and he buys only the ones that survive the attempt. It is a habit of looking for the flaw others miss.
The nearly 100 ventures he has built and tested give the process a reference library. Having tried a wide range of internet business models himself, most of them never launched, Hamak often recognizes the company in front of him as a variation on something he has already run. He knows which models bleed money quietly and which quietly compound.
He weighs the operational reality as heavily as the financial one. A business is only worth what it costs to run, and Hamak considers how much attention a given company will demand once it is his. His whole strategy points toward assets that can eventually operate with less of him, so a business that requires constant intervention is worth less to him than its numbers alone suggest.
Price, in his framework, is a function of downside as much as upside. Hamak favors situations where the loss is bounded and the potential is large or compounding, and he sizes an acquisition so that being wrong is survivable. The goal is not to find the perfect business but to buy sound ones at prices where the math forgives an error.
He keeps the particulars confidential, on principle. Hamak declines to disclose the specifics of his acquisitions or the figures involved, drawing a firm line around that information. He will describe how he evaluates a business in detail while keeping the identities and terms of the deals private.
He pays particular attention to the story a seller tells, because the story is where the flaws are usually hidden. A polished narrative about growth can paper over a dependency on one platform, one supplier, or one temporary tailwind. Hamak’s instinct, honed by security work, is to treat the pitch as the thing most likely to be concealing something, and to keep probing until the business’s real load-bearing structure is visible rather than the version the seller prefers.
The evaluation does not end at purchase, either, because his read has to survive contact with operation. Hamak buys with a thesis about how he will improve the business, and the diligence is really a test of whether that thesis is plausible. A company he cannot see a path to strengthening is one he will pass on, however clean the numbers, because for him a good acquisition is not a good business at rest but a good business he can make better.
Over time the discipline has made him comfortable walking away, which he regards as the underrated half of acquiring well. For every business Hamak buys, there are many he examines and declines, and he treats a confident no as a form of success rather than a missed chance. A buyer who cannot say no ends up owning his worst analyses; Hamak’s willingness to pass on all but the soundest is what keeps the portfolio’s quality where he wants it.
The result is a buyer who trusts his own read over the seller’s story. Hamak inspects the machine, stress-tests the numbers, and imagines the future that could break it, then pays a price that assumes he might be wrong. For a founder built on patience, careful buying is where the patience starts, long before the holding does.
Learn more: akamhamak.com | Connect on LinkedIn
